Manning, G., Whyte, D. B., Martinez, R., Hunter, T. & Sudarsanam, S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 298, 1912–1934 (2002).
Google Scholar
Ubersax, J. A. & Ferrell, J. E. Jr. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 530–541 (2007).
Google Scholar
Hunter, T. Why nature chose phosphate to modify proteins. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367, 2513–2516 (2012).
Google Scholar
Strumillo, M. J. et al. Conserved phosphorylation hotspots in eukaryotic protein domain families. Nat. Commun. 10, 1977 (2019).
Google Scholar
Boekhorst, J., van Breukelen, B., Heck, A. J. & Snel, B. Comparative phosphoproteomics reveals evolutionary and functional conservation of phosphorylation across eukaryotes. Genome Biol. 9, R144 (2008).
Google Scholar
Singh, V. et al. Phosphorylation: implications in cancer. Protein J. 36, 1–6 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yarbro, J. M. et al. Human and mouse proteomics reveals the shared pathways in Alzheimer’s disease and delayed protein turnover in the amyloidome. Nat. Commun. 16, 1533 (2025).
Google Scholar
Johnson, P. & Cross, J. Tyrosine phosphorylation in immune cells: direct and indirect effects on Toll-like receptor-induced proinflammatory cytokine production. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 29, 347–367 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kuuliala, K. et al. Constitutive STAT3 phosphorylation in circulating CD4+ T lymphocytes associates with disease activity and treatment response in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE 10, e0137385 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wu, D. et al. Glucose-regulated phosphorylation of TET2 by AMPK reveals a pathway linking diabetes to cancer. Nature 559, 637–641 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hornbeck, P. et al. PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D261–D270 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hornbeck, P. et al. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D512–D520 (2015).
Google Scholar
Cesaro, L. & Pinna, L. A. Prevalence and significance of the commonest phosphorylated motifs in the human proteome: a global analysis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 77, 5281–5298 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mok, J. et al. Deciphering protein kinase specificity through large-scale analysis of yeast phosphorylation site motifs. Sci. Signal. 3, ra12 (2010).
Google Scholar
Miller, C. & Turk, B. E. Homing in: mechanisms of substrate targeting by protein kinases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 43, 380–394 (2018).
Google Scholar
Johnson, J. L. et al. An atlas of substrate specificities for the human serine/threonine kinome. Nature 613, 759–766 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yaffe, M. B. et al. A motif-based profile scanning approach for genome-wide prediction of signaling pathways. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 348–353 (2001).
Google Scholar
Kemp, B. & Pearson, R. Protein kinase recognition sequence motifs. Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 342–346 (1990).
Google Scholar
Yaron-Barir, T. et al. The intrinsic substrate specificity of the human tyrosine kinome. Nature 629, 1174–1181 (2024).
Google Scholar
Landry, C. R., Freschi, L., Zarin, T. & Moses, A. M. Turnover of protein phosphorylation evolving under stabilizing selection. Front. Genet. 5, 245 (2014).
Google Scholar
Moses, A. M., Heriche, J.-K. & Durbin, R. Clustering of phosphorylation site recognition motifs can be exploited to predict the targets of cyclin-dependent kinase. Genome Biol. 8, R23 (2007).
Google Scholar
Alexander, J. et al. Spatial exclusivity combined with positive and negative selection of phosphorylation motifs is the basis for context-dependent mitotic signaling. Sci. Signal. 4, ra42 (2014).
Durek, P., Schudoma, C., Weckwerth, W., Selbig, J. & Walther, D. Detection and characterization of 3D-signature phosphorylation site motifs and their contribution towards improved phosphorylation site prediction in proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 117 (2009).
Google Scholar
Small, D., Chou, P. Y. & Fasman, G. D. Occurrence of phosphorylated residues in predicted β-turns: implications for β-turn participation in control mechanisms. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 79, 341–346 (1977).
Google Scholar
Andrew, C. D., Warwicker, J., Jones, G. R. & Doig, A. J. Effect of phosphorylation on α-helix stability as a function of position. Biochemistry 41, 1897–1905 (2002).
Google Scholar
Szilak, L., Moitra, J., Krylov, D. & Vinson, C. Phosphorylation destabilizes α-helices. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 112–114 (1997).
Google Scholar
Zhu, G. et al. Exceptional disfavor for proline at the p + 1 position among AGC and CAMK kinases establishes reciprocal specificity between them and the proline-directed kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10743–10748 (2005).
Google Scholar
Iakoucheva, L. M. et al. The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acid Res. 32, 1037–1049 (2004).
Google Scholar
Uversky, V. N. A decade and a half of protein intrinsic disorder: biology still waits for physics. Protein Sci. 22, 693–724 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bludau, I. et al. The structural context of posttranslational modifications at a proteome-wide scale. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001636 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brinkworth, R. I., Breinl, R. A. & Kobe, B. Structural basis and prediction of substrate specificity in protein serine/threonine kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 74–79 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kamacioglu, A., Tuncbag, N. & Ozlu, N. Structural analysis of mammalian protein phosphorylation at a proteome level. Structure 29, 1219–1229 (2021).
Google Scholar
Graether, S. P. Troubleshooting guide to expressing intrinsically disordered proteins for use in NMR experiments. Front. Mol. Biosci. 5, 118 (2018).
Google Scholar
Schiavina, M. et al. Intrinsically disordered proteins studied by NMR spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. Open 18, 100143 (2024).
Brutscher, B. et al. NMR methods for the study of instrinsically disordered proteins structure, dynamics, and interactions: general overview and practical guidelines. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 870, 49–122 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rauh, A. S., Hedemark, G. S., Tesei, G. & Lindorff-Larsen, K. A coarse-grained model for simulations of phosphorylated disordered proteins. Biophys. J. 125, 396–405 (2026).
Google Scholar
Pedikari, T. M. et al. A predictive coarse-grained model for position-specific effects of post-translational modifications. Biophys. J. 120, 1187–1197 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pakhrin, S. C. et al. A deep learning-based approach for general protein phosphorylation site prediction using embeddings from the local window sequence and pretrained protein language model. J. Proteome Res. 22, 2548–2557 (2023).
Xu, Z., Zhong, H., He, B., Wang, X. & Lu, T. PTransIPs: identification of phosphorylation sites enhanced by protein PLM embeddings. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 28, 3762–3771 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wen, B. et al. DeepMVP: deep learning models trained on high-quality data accurately predict PTM sites and variant-induced alterations. Nat. Methods 22, 1857–1867 (2025).
Google Scholar
Tyanova, S., Cox, J., Olsen, J., Mann, M. & Frishman, D. Phosphorylation variation during the cell cycle scales with structural propensities of proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002842 (2013).
Google Scholar
Elkan, C. & Noto, K. Learning classifiers from only positive and unlabeled data. In Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (eds Liu, B. & Sarawagi, S.) 213–220 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2008).
Jain, S., White, M. & Radivojac, P. Recovering true classifier performance in positive-unlabeled learning. In Proc. 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (eds Singh, S. & Markovitch, S.) 2066–2072 (Association for Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2017).
Davis, J. & Goadrich, M. The relationship between precision–recall and ROC curves. In Proc. 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Cohen, W. & Moore, A.) 233–240 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2006).
Saito, T. & Rehmsmeier, M. The precision–recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLoS ONE 10, e0118432 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ishikawa, H., Xu, A., Ogura, E., Manning, G. & Irvine, K. The Raine syndrome protein FAM20C is a Golgi kinase that phosphorylates bio-mineralization proteins. PLoS ONE 7, e42988 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tagliabracci, V. et al. A single kinase generates the majority of the secreted phosphoproteome. Cell 161, 1619–1632 (2016).
Google Scholar
Uhlen, M. et al. The human secretome. Sci. Signal. 12, eaaz0274 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cesaro, L. et al. Comprehensive analysis of the putative substratome of FAM20C, the master serine kinase of the secretory pathway. Biomolecules 15, 1582 (2025).
Google Scholar
Pirkmajer, S. & Chibalin, A. V. Serum starvation: caveat emptor. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 301, C272–C279 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ley, R. et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 are serum-stimulated ‘BimEL kinases’ that bind to the BH3-only protein BimEL causing its phosphorylation and turnover. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 8837–8847 (2004).
Google Scholar
Lozzio, C. B. & Lozzio, B. B. Human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell-line with positive Philadelphia chromosome. Blood 45, 321–334 (1975).
Google Scholar
Karagiannis, T. et al. Characterization of K562 cells: uncovering novel chromosomes, assessing transferrin receptor expression, and probing pharmacological therapies. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 80, 248 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ma, J. et al. HER2 as a promising target for cytotoxicity T cells in human melanoma therapy. PLoS ONE 8, e73261 (2013).
Google Scholar
Behrens, E. M. et al. The mer receptor tyrosine kinase: expression and function suggest a role in innate immunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 33, 2160–2167 (2003).
Google Scholar
Rothlin, C. V., Carrera-Silva, E. A., Bosurgi, L. & Ghosh, S. TAM receptor signaling in immune homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 33, 355–391 (2015).
Google Scholar
Saito, T., Itoh, M. & Tohda, S. TYRO3 knockdown suppresses the growth of myeloid leukaemia cells. Anticancer Res. 42, 1757–1761 (2022).
Google Scholar
Graham, D. K., DeRyckere, D., Davies, K. D. & Earp, H. S. The TAM family: phosphatidylserine-sensing receptor tyrosine kinases gone awry in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 769–785 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yousaf, M., Arif, K. & Khan, D. TAM family kinases are potential candidate targets for therapeutic intervention in chronic myeloid leukemia. Discov. Oncol. 16, 1944 (2025).
Google Scholar
Frajno, M. et al. Proteome activity landscapes of tumor cell lines determine drug responses. Nat. Commun. 11, 3639 (2020).
Google Scholar
Corsello, S. M., Nagari, R. T., Spangler, R. D., Rossen, J. & Golub, T. R. Discovering the anti-cancer potential of non-oncology drugs by systematic viability profiling. Nat. Cancer 1, 235–248 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kalyuzhnyy, A. et al. Profiling the human phosphoproteome to estimate the true extent of protein phosphorylation. J. Proteome Res. 21, 1510–1524 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ochoa, D. et al. The functional landscape of the human phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 365–373 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zadrozny, B. & Elkan, C. Transforming classifier scores into accurate multiclass probability estimates. In Proc. 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (eds Goebel, R., Hand, D., Keim, D. & Ng, R.) 699–694 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2002).
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 421 (2009).
Google Scholar
Vanderwall, D. KinoPlex: ultra-deep phosphoproteomics in K562 with LC/LC–MS/MS DIA Astral. MassIVE https://doi.org/10.25345/C5W95120W (2026).
Vanderwall, D. KinoPlex structural atlas data: a structural atlas decodes kinase specificity across the human proteome datasets. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20633591 (2026).
Vanderwall, D. KinoPlex Codebase. GitHub https://github.com/dvanderwall/kinoplex (2026).